TL;DR
Get home office essentials delivered free with Prime
- Fast, free delivery on millions of items
- Prime Video, Amazon Music and more included
- Member-only deals all year
A Kiplinger advice column examined whether a retired couple with about $10 million in net worth should keep an aggressive investment portfolio. The experts quoted said their income sources may give them room to take investment risk, but the right allocation depends on spending needs, willingness to withstand losses and tax planning.
A Kiplinger retirement advice column has considered whether a retired couple with about $10 million in net worth should maintain an aggressive investment portfolio, drawing on advisers who point to the couple’s substantial income and assets while stressing that spending plans, market-loss tolerance and tax strategy matter. The question is relevant to retirees who have wealth earmarked for heirs but still need to protect their own financial security.
The reader, identified by Kiplinger as “Legacy Builder,” said he and his 72-year-old wife receive about $9,600 a month from Social Security, a pension and annuities. Their roughly $10 million net worth includes about $3 million in real estate, a $3.8 million IRA, $850,000 in Roth accounts, a $900,000 Generation-Skipping Trust and $800,000 in non-tax-deferred accounts, including $150,000 in cash. The reader said their portfolio is heavily invested in mutual funds and exchange-traded funds, some of them fairly aggressive, because he wants to invest for heirs.
Phillip E. Battin, president and CEO of Ambassador Wealth Management, said he was not particularly concerned by the portfolio based on the information provided, citing the couple’s assets and income. He noted that rental income could be affected if tenants leave, but said the couple did not appear to rely heavily on it and could potentially sell the property. The rental house was reported to generate $1,500 a month in net income and carry an $180,000 mortgage.
Other advisers cautioned against treating “aggressive” as a synonym for concentrated or speculative investing. Robert Jeter, a certified financial planner at Back Bay Financial Planning & Investments, advised keeping an investment approach simple and considering asset location for tax efficiency. Brandon M. Cox, founder of Coastline Complete Wealth, raised the possibility of converting some traditional IRA funds to Roth accounts, while Chris Berkel of AXIS Financial said a useful risk assessment requires knowing the couple’s spending goals and ability and willingness to absorb losses.
Income, Spending and Portfolio Risk
The central issue is not the couple’s net worth alone, but whether their income can cover their spending without requiring them to sell investments during a market decline. Battin’s assessment is based on the reported figures, but the source does not provide a full household budget or a detailed portfolio breakdown. Those details could change how much risk is appropriate.
The distinction matters for other retirees, too: a portfolio can be large while still supporting significant spending, and predictable income does not remove the risk of losses. A sharp decline may be more manageable when withdrawals are not needed to pay routine expenses; it can be harder to tolerate when a retiree depends on investments to fund near-term needs. A strategy intended to leave money to heirs still has to account for the couple’s own financial needs and comfort with volatility.
The advisers also raised tax consequences as part of the decision. Where assets are held and whether traditional IRA funds are converted to Roth accounts may affect taxes for the couple, a surviving spouse or beneficiaries. The column presents these as planning questions, not as a single prescription or a guarantee that a particular move will reduce taxes.
retirement investment portfolio management book
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
The Assets Behind the Advice
The reader said the couple owns its primary home and vacation home outright. The reported real estate total also includes the rental property, which has a mortgage. Their financial assets are spread across traditional retirement accounts, Roth accounts, a trust and taxable accounts, alongside the reported income from Social Security, pension and annuities. This mix is why the advisers discussed both portfolio risk and the location of investments across account types.
In the column, Jeter said the couple’s more aggressive investments could be held in taxable and Roth accounts, with more conservative holdings in tax-deferred accounts. Battin also discussed the potential relevance of a step-up in cost basis for taxable assets passed to heirs. Cox pointed to possible Roth conversions, noting that traditional IRA distributions can have tax consequences for a surviving spouse and beneficiaries. These are adviser comments reported by Kiplinger; the supplied material does not establish that the couple has adopted any of these strategies.
The source also makes clear that an aggressive allocation does not have to mean betting heavily on one sector or speculative assets. Jeter described the potential value of simplifying an investment strategy to limit tracking error and tax drag. The column does not report the couple’s actual stock-and-bond percentages or the specific funds they hold.
“I would absolutely be looking at whether it makes sense to start converting some of that IRA money to Roth.”
— Brandon M. Cox, CFP and founder of Coastline Complete Wealth, as quoted by Kiplinger
tax-efficient investment funds for retirees
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
The Missing Budget and Portfolio Detail
The supplied account does not state the couple’s annual spending, their full investment allocation, expected future expenses, health-care plans or the extent to which they draw on portfolio assets. Berkel specifically contrasted possible spending of $150,000 a year with $400,000 a year to illustrate how spending could change the risk assessment; those figures were examples, not reported spending for the couple.
It is also unclear how the couple would respond emotionally to a large market decline, whether the rental property will remain occupied, and what their estate and tax circumstances are. The source provides advisers’ general reactions, but no independent review of the couple’s financial records and no final recommendation tailored to a complete plan.
aggressive mutual funds for seniors
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
Planning Steps Before Changing Risk
The column’s next step is a full financial plan that compares guaranteed income with spending needs and tests whether the couple could meet near-term expenses without selling investments after a downturn. That analysis would also need to account for the rental property’s income and costs, cash reserves, and the couple’s goals for their own retirement and their heirs.
Separately, the couple could review whether their investments are diversified and appropriately placed across taxable, Roth and tax-deferred accounts, and whether Roth conversions fit their circumstances. The source does not report any decision or planned transaction. Any changes would depend on individualized financial and tax advice; investments can lose value, and an aggressive portfolio can expose retirees to substantial volatility.
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
Key Questions
What did the retired couple report about their finances?
The reader reported about $10 million in net worth, roughly $9,600 a month in Social Security, pension and annuity income, and assets across real estate, retirement accounts, a trust and taxable accounts. The figures come from the reader’s letter as quoted by Kiplinger.
Did the advisers say the couple should invest aggressively?
They did not provide a single definitive allocation. Battin said he was not particularly worried based on the reported assets and income, while the advisers also stressed spending needs, risk tolerance, diversification and tax planning.
Why does the couple’s spending matter?
Spending helps show whether income covers routine needs or whether the couple may need to withdraw from investments. Required withdrawals during a market decline can make losses harder to manage. The source does not state the couple’s actual annual spending.
What tax strategies did the column discuss?
Advisers discussed placing investments across account types and considering whether some traditional IRA money could be converted to a Roth account. These were planning possibilities, not confirmed decisions or guaranteed tax savings.
Source: rss
Evergreen bestsellers Picks
bestsellers
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
